Schenker Vision 14 Laptop in review -12700H performance upgrade

Schenker Vision 14 Laptop in review -12700H performance upgrade

Now with a 99-Wh battery. Considering the low weight, even the Tiger Lake Schenker Vision 14 with the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti GPU was a very powerful 14-inch laptop that gets a massive boost with this generation’s Alder Lake Core i7-12700H upgrade. Additionally, the battery size has been increased for significantly improved runtimes.

Last year, Schenker released a very exciting 14-inch laptop that shines with extreme portability thanks to its low weight of just above 1 kg (2.2 lbs) called the Vision 14, while not compromising in terms of a good port selection or performance. Earlier this year, the device was refreshed with an Intel Tiger Lake-H35 processor including a more effective cooling solution that features liquid metal as well as a dedicated GeForce RTX 3050 Ti GPU option. Our main qualms with the aforementioned laptop were the mediocre performance of the 11th gen Intel processor and the relatively short battery life.

Although Schenker announced the Vision 14 refresh a couple of months ago, we just now got the chance to review it due to supply chain issues. Contrary to our first impression, the new device is a fairly major upgrade that also comes with a massive 99-Wh battery option and required certain changes to the interal layout. Additionally, the older quad-core processor from the Tiger Lake generation has been replaced by an up-to-date Alder Lake model. Unlike most other devices in this category, Schenker did not opt for an Alder Lake-P processor (28W TDP) and instead went with the 45-watt processor Core i7-12700H.

We received two versions of the Vision 14 courtesy of Schenker; one with and one without the dedicated GeForce GPU. Since they are otherwise identical (Core i7-12700H, 3K panel, 99-Wh battery), we will list the small differences in this review instead of reviewing both devices separately. The new Vision 14 with an iGPU starts at ~1659 USD, while the RTX 3050 Ti model can be purchased starting from around 1931 USD. The models can be configured with a wide range of available RAM and SSD options; our test device comes with 32 GB of RAM and a 1-TB PCIe-4.0 SSD (Samsung 980 Pro) for about 2200 USD.

Processor

Intel Core i7-12700H 14 x 1.7 – 4.7 GHz, 60 W PL2 / Short Burst, 40 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-P

Memory

32 GB 

, DDR4-3200, dual-channel, 2 slots, up to 64 GB

Display

14.00 inch 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixel 243 PPI, MNE007ZA1-1, IPS, glossy: no, 90 Hz

Mainboard

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH

Soundcard

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH – cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Connections

2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5mm stereo, Card Reader: SDXC

Networking

Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n=Wi-Fi 4/ac=Wi-Fi 5/ax=Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 16.6 x 308.8 x 215 (=0.65 x 12.16 x 8.46 in)

Battery

99.8 Wh, 6450 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Camera

Webcam: 1080p + IR
Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 90W PSU, USB thumb drive, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.31 kg (= 46.21 oz / 2.89 pounds), Power Supply: 506 g (= 17.85 oz / 1.12 pounds)

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

The overall design of the Schenker Vision 14 has remained unchanged and there are black and silver models available. While the display bezels consist of plastic, the remaining parts (lid, base unit) are made of a magnesium alloy. The rigidity continues to be excellent, but the screen is very thin, which makes it quite flexible as evidenced by the distortions that occur when applying focused pressure on the back of the lid. During daily use, there are no limitations.

The hinge is still a weakness of the Vision 14. Although the firmness of the hinge has been improved (~0.32 Nm vs. 0.25 Nm on the predecessor) according to Schenker, there is still noticeable teetering when adjusting the angle (up to 160 degrees). Opening the display with one hand is possible on both the new and the old model. The silver version less susceptible to fingerprints and grease than the black model during daily use.

With a 99-Wh battery and a GeForce RTX 3050 Ti, our test device’s weight of 1310 g (~2.89 lbs) exceeds that of its predecessor by almost 200 g (~0.44 lbs), which makes it the heaviest skew of the Vision 14. The lighter 53-Wh model (~1.1 kg / ~2.43 lbs). At 1269 g (~2.80 lbs), the 99-Wh variant of the Vision 14 without the RTX 3050 Ti is just marginally lighter. Meanwhile, the new 99-Wh models are also thicker by 1 mm (16.6 vs. 15.6 mm / 0.65 vs. 0.61 in).

Comparatively, even the highest configuration of our test device weighs noticeably less than other devices in our comparison with dedicated graphics cards. With 513 g (~1.13 lbs), the included AC adapter is relatively heavy.

      Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T       Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P       Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420       Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry       Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022       Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti       Schenker Vision 14 ❌

318 mm / 12.5 inch
225 mm / 8.86 inch

19 mm / 0.748 inch

1.5 kg3.25 lbs318 mm / 12.5 inch
230 mm / 9.06 inch

15.25 mm / 0.6 inch

1.4 kg3.15 lbs314 mm / 12.4 inch
227.5 mm / 8.96 inch

18.87 mm / 0.743 inch

1.7 kg3.68 lbs312.6 mm / 12.3 inch
221.2 mm / 8.71 inch

15.5 mm / 0.61 inch

1.6 kg3.53 lbs310 mm / 12.2 inch
221 mm / 8.7 inch

15.6 mm / 0.614 inch

1.3 kg2.8 lbs308.8 mm / 12.2 inch
215 mm / 8.46 inch

16.6 mm / 0.654 inch

1.3 kg2.89 lbs308.8 mm / 12.2 inch
215 mm / 8.46 inch

15.6 mm / 0.614 inch

1.1 kg2.48 lbs

There have been no changes in terms of the connectivity, which means users continue to benefit from the same, generous port selection that includes Thunderbolt 4. A fullsize card reader is also available. Schenker still uses the Intel AX201 Wi-Fi module, which reaches good transfer speeds in our testing. Since the antenna setup of the Vision 14 does not support 6-GHz networks, Wi-Fi 6E modules (such as the AX211) are not available.

Left: Kensington Lock, USB-C 3.2 gen. 2 (10 Gb/s, DisplayPort ALT mode 1.4, Power Delivery), USB-A 3.2 gen. (5 Gb/s), card reader, 3.5-mm audio
Right: USB-C 4.0 w/ Thunderbolt 4 (40 Gb/s, DisplayPort ALT mode 1.4, Power Delivery), USB 3.2 gen. 1 (5 Gb/s), HDMI 2.0b, AC adapter

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201

1570 (1446min – 1613max) MBit/s ∼100%

Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (1115 – 1734, n=30)

1530 MBit/s ∼97% -3%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (353 – 1749, n=13, last 2 years)

1412 MBit/s ∼90% -10%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201

1458 (1294min – 1591max) MBit/s ∼100%

Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (891 – 1715, n=25)

1382 MBit/s ∼95% -5%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (343 – 1745, n=13, last 2 years)

1315 MBit/s ∼90% -10%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (1424 – 1771, n=12, last 2 years)

1632 MBit/s ∼100%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211

1623 (1598min, 1598P1 – 1662max) MBit/s ∼99%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211

1467 (1440min – 1493max) MBit/s ∼90%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211

1423 (1154min – 1500max) MBit/s ∼87%

Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (390 – 1670, n=3)

993 MBit/s ∼61%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
MediaTek MT7921

920 (911min – 931max) MBit/s ∼56%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211

1639 (1603min, 1605.03P1 – 1687max) MBit/s ∼100%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211

1613 (1478min – 1688max) MBit/s ∼98%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (1130 – 1735, n=12, last 2 years)

1419 MBit/s ∼87%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211

1305 (1032min – 1456max) MBit/s ∼80%

Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (745 – 1252, n=3)

993 MBit/s ∼61%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
MediaTek MT7921

966 (467min – 1030max) MBit/s ∼59%

0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600Tooltip; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1569 (1446-1613)

; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1458 (1294-1591)

The sensor of the webcam has been upgraded from the older 720p to a 1080p version. This slightly improves the image sharpness, while keeping the color deviations fairly low overall.

8.9 ∆E

9.1 ∆E

5.3 ∆E

5.1 ∆E

4.6 ∆E

6.2 ∆E

17.4 ∆E

5.3 ∆E

6.7 ∆E

2.7 ∆E

7.3 ∆E

11.3 ∆E

4.5 ∆E

7 ∆E

4.6 ∆E

12.1 ∆E

2 ∆E

4.7 ∆E

6 ∆E

4.7 ∆E

4 ∆E

5.3 ∆E

6.8 ∆E

3.9 ∆E

ColorChecker Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti: 6.48 ∆E min: 2.03 – max: 17.41 ∆E

2x SODIMMThe bottom plate can be easily removed to immediately reveal the new 99-Wh on the inside as well as several coinciding changes to the mainboard and the speakers. This means that the new battery does not fit previous Vision 14 models. It should be noted that the secondary M.2-2280 slot is not available on models with the bigger battery. The RAM and the Wi-Fi module are still upgradeable.

The input devices remain unchanged compared to the previous model. The backlit keyboard offers a comfortable typing experience with quiet key clatter. While the glass touchpad (13 x 8 cm / 5.12 x 3.15 in) is good as well, its clicks are very loud.

There is not much to say for the display, since the manufacturer still relies on the same, matte 3K panel (16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixels). The display quality is excellent and bright areas do not look grainy despite the matte layer. In our professional CalMAN software analysis, the panel fares well, too. It reaches an average brightness of ~415 nits and a good contrast ratio of 1500:1. Ex-factory, there is a faint tint, although we were able to fix this through our calibration. With a full sRGB coverage, photo editing is also possible. The panel does not rely on PWM.

416
cd/m²406
cd/m²404
cd/m²413
cd/m²421
cd/m²396
cd/m²431
cd/m²443
cd/m²411
cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

MNE007ZA1-1

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 443 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 415.7 cd/m² Minimum: 19.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 424 cd/m²
Contrast: 1504:1 (Black: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.2 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.3, calibrated: 2
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.5
75.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
74.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.22

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
MNE007ZA1-1, IPS, 2880×1800, 14.00Schenker Vision 14
MNE007ZA1, IPS, 2880×1800, 14.00Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
TMX1422, IPS, 3120×2080, 14.20Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
LEN140WQUXGA, OLED, 3840×2400, 14.00Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
InfoVision 140NWHE, IPS, 2240×1400, 14.00Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
SAMSUNG: SDC4171, OLED, 2880×1800, 14.00Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Mini-LED, 3024×1964, 14.20 Display P3 Coverage74.1

74.3

0%

94.6

28%

98.7

33%

68.8

-7%

99.41

34%

99.3

34%

sRGB Coverage97.4

97.6

0%

99.5

2%

99.8

2%

99.3

2%

99.94

3%

AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage75.3

75.7

1%

86.5

15%

98.5

31%

69.5

-8%

94.79

26%

Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *31.5 ?(14, 17.5)

40.4 ?(18.8, 21.6)

-28%

25.4 ?(11.7, 13.7)

19%

2.8 ?(1.2, 1.6)

91%

32.8 ?(16, 16.8)

-4%

3 ?(1, 2)

90%

58.4 ?(27.6, 30.8)

-85%

Response Time Black / White *14.5 ?(4.7, 9.8)

18.4 ?(6, 12.4)

-27%

17.1 ?(8.6, 8.51)

-18%

2.8 ?(1.2, 1.6)

81%

22.8 ?(12, 10.8)

-57%

3 ?(1, 2)

79%

40.4 ?(20.8, 19.6)

-179%

PWM Frequency239.2 ?(50)

360

14880

Brightness middle421

407

-3%

603

43%

361

-14%

331.1

-21%

384

-9%

489

16%

Brightness416

407

-2%

586

41%

362

-13%

326

-22%

385

-7%

479

15%

Brightness Distribution89

94

6%

91

2%

98

10%

85

-4%

98

10%

94

6%

Black Level *0.28

0.25

11%

0.39

-39%

0.001

100%

0.29

-4%

0.07

75%

0.01

96%

Contrast1504

1628

8%

1546

3%

361000

23903%

1142

-24%

5486

265%

48900

3151%

Colorchecker dE 2000 *3.2

2.6

19%

1.1

66%

2.8

12%

2.23

30%

1.75

45%

0.8

75%

Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *5.5

4.4

20%

2.2

60%

5.8

-5%

5.44

1%

3.41

38%

1.3

76%

Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *2

2

-0%

1.2

40%

0.63

68%

2.32

-16%

Greyscale dE 2000 *4.4

2.7

39%

1.5

66%

1.9

57%

3.6

18%

1.06

76%

1.1

75%

Gamma2.22 99%

2.18 101%

2.17 101%

2.16 102%

2.21 100%

2.39 92%

2.24 98%

CCT6384 102%

6316 103%

6549 99%

6181 105%

6022 108%

6440 101%

* … smaller is better

Display Response Timesℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession – a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detectedIn comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19739 (minimum: 5 – maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

There are once again two base profiles with three subprofiles, each, available on the preinstalled Control Center software (quiet & performance). Conveniently, the base profiles can be switched between via the F3 key. The following table lists the performance data for various power profiles.

Profile
CPU Stress
GPU Stress
Combined CPU+GPU Stress
Max. fan noise

Quiet 20 dB
10 watts
20 watts
CPU: 10 watts

GPU: 20 watts
32.5 dB(A)

Quiet 30 dB
13 watts
25 watts
CPU: 13 watts

GPU: 25 watts
40 dB(A)

Quiet 40 dB
15 watts
35 watts
CPU: 15 watts

GPU: 35 watts
45.8 dB(A)

Performance Balanced
60 -> 20 watts
45 watts
CPU: 20 watts

GPU: 40 watts
45.8 dB(A)

Performance Enthusiast
60 -> 40 watts
45 watts
CPU: 25 watts

GPU: 35 watts
48.8 dB(A)

Performance Overboost
60 -> 45 watts
45 watts
CPU: 25 watts

GPU: 35 watts
51.1 dB(A)

There are two noticeable differences between our test device and the older model. While the older Tiger Lake Core i7-11370H was limited to 46 watts, the newer Core i7-12700H has access to up to 60 W. Meanwhile, the RTX 3050 Ti now has to make do with 45 watts (35-watt TGP + 10 watts Dynamic Boost), whereas up to 50 watts was available to the GPU on the older model.

Since the Performance Enthusiast profile offers the best compromises overall, we chose it for our tests. In some of the following sections (and the system noisie section in particular), we will take a closer look at other profiles as well, although users may want to choose one of the weaker profiles to benefit from quieter fan noise in undemanding day-to-day scenrio.

The Core i7-12700H is a 45-watt processor with 6 performance and 8 efficiency cores, enabling it to simultaneously process up to 20 threads. The TDP limits (60/40 watts) are held firmly and the performance is excellent overall. The older Core i7-11370H not only falls behind significantly in the multi-thread tests (the newer model is essentially twice as fast here), but also in the single-thread tests thanks to the new performance cores.

0125250375500625750875100011251250137515001625175018752000212522502375Tooltip

Now for the question whether the Core i7-12700H makes more sense at these TDP values than an Alder Lake-P processor such as the Core i7-1260P (with 4 performance cores). The answer is unequivocally yes, since the number of performance cores is what ultimately matters. As we know, the performance cores become more and more inefficient at higher clock speeds. Although distributing the available TDP between more performance cores results in slightly lower clock speeds, it also results in lower temperatures which in turn benefit the performance. Additionally, the two additional cores more than compensate for the slightly lower clock speeds. While this would also be the case for a Core i7-1280P (same core configuration as the i7-12700H), the OEM does not offer Alder Lake-P chips for the barebone version of the Vision 14 with dual heatpipes.

The advantage of the Core i7-12700H becomes very apparent in a comparison with the Lenovo Yoga 9i 14, which runs the Core i7-1260P at a very similar TDP of 64/38 watts. Regardless, the Core i7-12700H outperforms it dramatically in the multi-thread tests (~18 % in our CB R15 multi loop). That being said, it should be noted that the Core i7-12700H is not able to unleash its full potential here, which would require over 120 watts for the maximum all-core clock speeds. The CPU performance of the iGPU version of the Vision 14 is identical.

In battery mode, the processor is limited to 45 and subsequently 40 watts, meaning the performance level remains fairly high. The performance dropoff becomes more significant at battery levels below 20 %. More CPU benchmarks can be found in our tech section.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2166 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

184.2 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

263 Points

Help

The Vision 14’s very responsive subjective impression is confirmed by our synthetic benchmarks. During our testing, we did not encounter any issues. Schenker’s decision not to use DDR5 RAM (due to cost, according to the manufacturer), does not impact daily use.

Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (6623 – 7075, n=3)

6848 Points ∼100% +3%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N
6660 Points ∼97% +1%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6623 Points ∼97%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB
6068 Points ∼89% -8%

Schenker Vision 14
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5838 Points ∼85% -12%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
5748 Points ∼84% -13%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5738 Points ∼84% -13%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (1671 – 6623, n=92, last 2 years)

5025 Points ∼73% -24%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10826 Points ∼100% +4%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB
10720 Points ∼99% +3%

Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (10172 – 10970, n=3)

10527 Points ∼97% +1%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10440 Points ∼96%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N
10150 Points ∼94% -3%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (4599 – 10836, n=92, last 2 years)

9532 Points ∼88% -9%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
9372 Points ∼87% -10%

Schenker Vision 14
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9234 Points ∼85% -12%

Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (8530 – 9555, n=3)

9061 Points ∼100% +6%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N
8995 Points ∼99% +5%

Schenker Vision 14
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
8806 Points ∼97% +3%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB
8629 Points ∼95% +1%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
8530 Points ∼94%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
7975 Points ∼88% -7%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7030 Points ∼78% -18%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (2813 – 9852, n=92, last 2 years)

7024 Points ∼78% -18%

Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (8855 – 9409, n=3)

9144 Points ∼100% +3%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
8855 Points ∼97%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N
8779 Points ∼96% -1%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
6897 Points ∼75% -22%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6739 Points ∼74% -24%

Schenker Vision 14
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6641 Points ∼73% -25%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB
6556 Points ∼72% -26%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (973 – 8855, n=92, last 2 years)

5215 Points ∼57% -41%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB
1811 Points ∼100% +9%

Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1654 – 1872, n=3)

1755 Points ∼97% +6%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N
1717 Points ∼95% +4%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1685 Points ∼93% +2%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1654 Points ∼91%

Schenker Vision 14
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1502 Points ∼83% -9%

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
1490 Points ∼82% -10%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (718 – 1811, n=39, last 2 years)

1386 Points ∼77% -16%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
1295 Points ∼72% -22%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB
1755 Points ∼100% +8%

Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1625 – 1792, n=3)

1689 Points ∼96% +4%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1625 Points ∼93%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N
1620 Points ∼92% 0%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1604 Points ∼91% -1%

Schenker Vision 14
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1555 Points ∼89% -4%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (685 – 1755, n=39, last 2 years)

1375 Points ∼78% -15%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
1333 Points ∼76% -18%

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
1305 Points ∼74% -20%

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
1915 Points ∼100% +11%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N
1911 Points ∼100% +11%

Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1727 – 1993, n=3)

1879 Points ∼98% +9%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB
1869 Points ∼98% +8%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1821 Points ∼95% +5%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1727 Points ∼90%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (776 – 1928, n=39, last 2 years)

1467 Points ∼77% -15%

Schenker Vision 14
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1452 Points ∼76% -16%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
1320 Points ∼69% -24%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB
1807 Points ∼100% +18%

Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1523 – 1768, n=3)

1607 Points ∼89% +5%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1547 Points ∼86% +1%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1531 Points ∼85%

Schenker Vision 14
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1501 Points ∼83% -2%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N
1481 Points ∼82% -3%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (652 – 1807, n=39, last 2 years)

1211 Points ∼67% -21%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
1120 Points ∼62% -27%

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
1044 Points ∼58% -32%

PCMark 10 Score
6623 pointsHelp

The Vision 14 shows slightly increased latencies in our standardized latency test on the current BIOS version, making it a suboptimal choice for real-time applications. No frames were dropped during 4K video playback on YouTube.

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
987.7 μs * ∼100% -14%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
959.5 μs * ∼97% -10%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB
943.3 μs * ∼96% -9%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
868.4 μs * ∼88%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N
529.6 μs * ∼54% +39%

* … smaller is better

PCIe-4.0 M.2-2280 SSDAs previously mentioned, selecting the larger 99-Wh battery means there is no secondary M.2-2280 slot. Our test device is equipped with the Samsung Pro 1 TB, which reaches transfer speeds of up to 7 GB/s, making it one of the fastest drives available today. There are no thermal issues either and the performance remains entirely consistent even under continuous load. More SSD benchmarks can be found here.

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
7004 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
5245.6 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
651.75 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
466.39 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
88.59 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
221.94 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8:
2296.79 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8:
2826.12 MB/s

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

4012 (3903.22min – 4012.48max) MB/s ∼100% +3%

Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (2659 – 4315, n=22)

3892 MB/s ∼97% 0%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

3878 (3830.24min – 3878.26max) MB/s ∼97%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB

2773 (1245.11min – 2772.97max) MB/s ∼69% -28%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N

2293 (2283.8min – 2292.84max) MB/s ∼57% -41%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (376 – 4315, n=93, last 2 years)

2148 MB/s ∼54% -45%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ

2047 (1984.31min – 2046.51max) MB/s ∼51% -47%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

4146 (4097.82min – 4146.07max) MB/s ∼100% +4%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

4000 (3970.36min – 3999.69max) MB/s ∼96%

Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (2839 – 4360, n=22)

3961 MB/s ∼96% -1%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB

2451 (2412.98min – 2451.49max) MB/s ∼59% -39%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N

2045 (1925.53min – 2044.83max) MB/s ∼49% -49%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (62.6 – 4326, n=94, last 2 years)

2041 MB/s ∼49% -49%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ

1675 (1661.96min – 1674.57max) MB/s ∼40% -58%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

6876 (6162.32min – 6876.44max) MB/s ∼100%

Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (3227 – 6902, n=22)

6495 MB/s ∼94% -6%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

6082 (5108.93min – 6082.16max) MB/s ∼88% -12%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (436 – 6905, n=92, last 2 years)

3605 MB/s ∼52% -48%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N

3552 (3135.24min – 3552.16max) MB/s ∼52% -48%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB

3357 (3051.54min – 3357.12max) MB/s ∼49% -51%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ

2617 (2262.95min – 2617.24max) MB/s ∼38% -62%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

4971 (4954.47min – 4971.21max) MB/s ∼100% 0%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

4970 (4966.69min – 4970.17max) MB/s ∼100%

Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (3184 – 5043, n=22)

4857 MB/s ∼98% -2%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB

2865 (1154.69min – 2864.64max) MB/s ∼58% -42%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (60 – 5156, n=93, last 2 years)

2577 MB/s ∼52% -48%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N

2450 (2198.24min – 2449.82max) MB/s ∼49% -51%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ

1688 (1666.37min – 1687.79max) MB/s ∼34% -66%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

88.6 (88.22min – 88.59max) MB/s ∼100%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

86.2 (82.58min – 86.23max) MB/s ∼97% -3%

Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (62.7 – 94.3, n=22)

81.7 MB/s ∼92% -8%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N

63 (62.21min – 62.95max) MB/s ∼71% -29%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB

62.9 (62.62min – 62.94max) MB/s ∼71% -29%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ

57.8 (57.74min – 57.81max) MB/s ∼65% -35%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (12.6 – 141.9, n=93, last 2 years)

55.1 MB/s ∼62% -38%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB

269 (258.65min – 268.78max) MB/s ∼100% +20%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

224 (221.2min – 223.61max) MB/s ∼83%

Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (152.9 – 283, n=22)

223 MB/s ∼83% 0%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

215 (210.55min – 214.96max) MB/s ∼80% -4%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N

157.9 (153.98min – 157.89max) MB/s ∼59% -30%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (32.3 – 333, n=93, last 2 years)

149.9 MB/s ∼56% -33%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ

113.1 (112.24min – 113.09max) MB/s ∼42% -50%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

3484 (3457.82min – 3484.34max) MB/s ∼100%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

3345 (3332.76min – 3344.97max) MB/s ∼96% -4%

Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (926 – 4483, n=22)

3341 MB/s ∼96% -4%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB

1319 (4.13min – 1318.78max) MB/s ∼38% -62%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (102 – 3484, n=93, last 2 years)

1103 MB/s ∼32% -68%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N

663 (638.34min – 663.33max) MB/s ∼19% -81%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ

477 (476.37min – 477.47max) MB/s ∼14% -86%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

2554 (2537.7min – 2554.39max) MB/s ∼100%

Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (358 – 4383, n=22)

2424 MB/s ∼95% -5%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

2382 (1954.07min – 2382.29max) MB/s ∼93% -7%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB

1513 (637.67min – 1513.33max) MB/s ∼59% -41%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (42.7 – 2554, n=93, last 2 years)

784 MB/s ∼31% -69%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ

506 (494.75min – 505.64max) MB/s ∼20% -80%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N

435 (416.67min – 434.59max) MB/s ∼17% -83%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
8363 Points ∼100%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8167 Points ∼98% -2%

Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (5629 – 9322, n=21)

7626 Points ∼91% -9%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB
4237 Points ∼51% -49%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N
3898 Points ∼47% -53%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (545 – 8363, n=92, last 2 years)

3679 Points ∼44% -56%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
2525 Points ∼30% -70%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3090 Points ∼100%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3045 Points ∼99% -1%

Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (1501 – 3512, n=21)

2925 Points ∼95% -5%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB
1600 Points ∼52% -48%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (179 – 3512, n=92, last 2 years)

1379 Points ∼45% -55%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N
1205 Points ∼39% -61%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
722 Points ∼23% -77%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3765 Points ∼100%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3626 Points ∼96% -4%

Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (1412 – 4194, n=21)

3279 Points ∼87% -13%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N
2122 Points ∼56% -44%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB
1826 Points ∼48% -52%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (251 – 3765, n=92, last 2 years)

1639 Points ∼44% -56%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
1484 Points ∼39% -61%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5315 MB/s ∼100%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5186 MB/s ∼98% -2%

Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (545 – 5692, n=21)

4816 MB/s ∼91% -9%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N
2892.47 MB/s ∼54% -46%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB
2790 MB/s ∼52% -48%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (426 – 5546, n=92, last 2 years)

2779 MB/s ∼52% -48%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
2525.69 MB/s ∼48% -52%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3838 MB/s ∼100% +2%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3766 MB/s ∼98%

Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (1613 – 4052, n=21)

3533 MB/s ∼92% -6%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB
2421 MB/s ∼63% -36%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N
1670.44 MB/s ∼44% -56%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (114 – 3955, n=92, last 2 years)

1658 MB/s ∼43% -56%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
1118.9 MB/s ∼29% -70%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
80.81 MB/s ∼100% +1%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
80.26 MB/s ∼99%

Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (53.5 – 86.8, n=21)

72.3 MB/s ∼89% -10%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N
60.79 MB/s ∼75% -24%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB
59.69 MB/s ∼74% -26%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
56.06 MB/s ∼69% -30%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (8.95 – 84.8, n=92, last 2 years)

54.3 MB/s ∼67% -32%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB
236.5 MB/s ∼100% +23%

Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (134.6 – 254, n=21)

193.6 MB/s ∼82% +1%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
192.81 MB/s ∼82% 0%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
192.61 MB/s ∼81%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N
182.28 MB/s ∼77% -5%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (48 – 294, n=92, last 2 years)

154.7 MB/s ∼65% -20%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
135.06 MB/s ∼57% -30%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2478.53 MB/s ∼100%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2445.65 MB/s ∼99% -1%

Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (923 – 2938, n=21)

2347 MB/s ∼95% -5%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB
1260.92 MB/s ∼51% -49%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (122.9 – 2938, n=92, last 2 years)

1047 MB/s ∼42% -58%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N
854.69 MB/s ∼34% -66%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
413.48 MB/s ∼17% -83%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3195.52 MB/s ∼100%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3049.61 MB/s ∼95% -5%

Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (811 – 3708, n=21)

2732 MB/s ∼85% -15%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N
1772.46 MB/s ∼55% -45%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB
1347.48 MB/s ∼42% -58%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (125.7 – 3196, n=92, last 2 years)

1319 MB/s ∼41% -59%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
1237.33 MB/s ∼39% -61%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
0.137 ms * ∼100% -523%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.021 – 0.5, n=91, last 2 years)

0.07302 ms * ∼53% -232%

Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (0.022 – 0.073, n=21)

0.04224 ms * ∼31% -92%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N
0.042 ms * ∼31% -91%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.022 ms * ∼16% -0%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.022 ms * ∼16%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB
0.021 ms * ∼15% +5%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N
0.087 ms * ∼100% -295%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.013 – 0.703, n=92, last 2 years)

0.06666 ms * ∼77% -203%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
0.056 ms * ∼64% -155%

Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (0.018 – 0.089, n=21)

0.03481 ms * ∼40% -58%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.022 ms * ∼25%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.021 ms * ∼24% +5%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB
0.016 ms * ∼18% +27%

* … smaller is better

034569010351380172520702415276031053450379541404485483051755520586562106555Tooltip: Ø6844 (6600.37-6857.69)

GPU-Z GeForce RTX 3050 TiThe Vision 14 still uses the popular Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti with a TGP of 35 watts (and an additional 10 watt Dynamic Boost from the CPU). The Nvidia RTX 3050 Ti is rated for a TGP of 35-80 watts, meaning our test model uses a weaker version of the chip. Benchmarking the Vision 14 reflects this with results that are slightly subpar for this GPU.

Compared to the predecessor with the RTX 3050 Ti, the latest Vision 14 is able to secure a small lead and lands on par with the M1 Pro GPU in the base-model Apple MacBook Pro 14. When choosing the iGPU version of the Vision 14, Intel’s Iris Xe Graphics G7 with 96 EUs is used instead, resulting in a significantly slower GPU performance, as evidenced by the competitors Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 and Huawei MateBook X Pro.

The GPU performance remains consistent even under continuous load, although it does suffer quite a bit in battery mode (~ 75 %). More GPU benchmarks can be found here.

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (10288 – 15611, n=23)

13276 Points ∼100% +8%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
12349 Points ∼93%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
12125 Points ∼91% -2%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
11485 Points ∼87% -7%

Schenker Vision 14
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11370H
11055 Points ∼83% -10%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P
5479 Points ∼41% -56%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P
5427 Points ∼41% -56%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (436 – 12349, n=95, last 2 years)

4399 Points ∼33% -64%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (4041 – 6122, n=24)

5248 Points ∼100% +10%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
4773 Points ∼91%

Schenker Vision 14
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11370H
4721 Points ∼90% -1%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
4503 Points ∼86% -6%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
4497 Points ∼86% -6%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P
1784 Points ∼34% -63%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P
1740 Points ∼33% -64%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (116 – 4773, n=93, last 2 years)

1401 Points ∼27% -71%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9340 – 9565, n=2)

9453 Points ∼100% +1%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
9340 Points ∼99%

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
9267 Points ∼98% -1%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (1726 – 9340, n=18, last 2 years)

4140 Points ∼44% -56%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P
3888 Points ∼41% -58%

3DMark 11 Performance
16439 points3DMark Fire Strike Score
11233 points3DMark Time Spy Score
5098 pointsHelp

Asus VivoBook Pro 16X OLED N7600PC-L2026X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11370H
783 Seconds * ∼100% -72%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (456 – 1548, n=19, last 2 years)

775 Seconds * ∼99% -70%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P
617 Seconds * ∼79% -35%

Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
525 Seconds * ∼67% -15%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (385 – 557, n=4)

459 Seconds * ∼59% -1%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
456 Seconds * ∼58% -0%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
456 Seconds * ∼58%

Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G3 ARH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
404 Seconds * ∼52% +11%

Dell Precision 7670
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12850HX
359 Seconds * ∼46% +21%

* … smaller is better

Since the gaming performance is still primarily defined by the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti, even though some benchmark results show the advantages of the faster processor, there are only minor differences between the new and the older Vision 14 particularly at very high quality settings. Many modern titles run smoothly even at high or maximum details, although the graphics settings will have to be reduced in very demanding titles such as Cyberpunk 2077 or F1 2022 in order to achieve smooth frame rates.

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
92 fps ∼100%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (62.4 – 110, n=23)

90.7 fps ∼99% -1%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU

83.5 (77min) fps ∼91% -9%

Schenker Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
73 fps ∼79% -21%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
67.4 fps ∼73% -27%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
36 fps ∼39% -61%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
33 fps ∼36% -64%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (9.3 – 92, n=81, last 2 years)

27.6 fps ∼30% -70%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (34.2 – 58.5, n=27)

47.9 fps ∼100% +8%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
47.7 fps ∼100% +8%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU

46 (43min) fps ∼96% +4%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

44.2 (42min, 42P1) fps ∼92%

Schenker Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

41.4 (39min, 40P1) fps ∼86% -6%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (5.6 – 44.2, n=73, last 2 years)

14.9 fps ∼31% -66%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

14.2 (12min, 13P1) fps ∼30% -68%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

14.1 (13min, 13P1) fps ∼29% -68%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

121 (14.8min, 76.9P1) fps ∼100%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (62.2 – 149, n=22)

119.3 fps ∼99% -1%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU

114.9 (13.9min, 76.9P1) fps ∼95% -5%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU

111.5 (15min, 58.8P1) fps ∼92% -8%

Schenker Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

104 (8.49min, 71.4P1) fps ∼86% -14%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (10 – 121, n=51, last 2 years)

31.5 fps ∼26% -74%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

26 (9.36min, 19.2P1) fps ∼21% -79%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

23.9 (9.75min, 18.5P1) fps ∼20% -80%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

67.5 (9.08min, 43.5P1) fps ∼100%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (39.6 – 75.6, n=23)

64.8 fps ∼96% -4%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU

61.8 (7.41min, 37P1) fps ∼92% -8%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU

59.7 (4.55min, 37P1) fps ∼88% -12%

Schenker Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

52.2 (9.58min, 29.4P1) fps ∼77% -23%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (5.01 – 67.5, n=46, last 2 years)

14.6 fps ∼22% -78%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

11.2 (4.2min, 7.58P1) fps ∼17% -83%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

10.2 (4.45min, 7.3P1) fps ∼15% -85%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (39 – 51.5, n=8)

44.3 fps ∼100% +11%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU

41 (11.4min) fps ∼93% +3%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
40 fps ∼90%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (7.4 – 40, n=8, last 2 years)

15.9 fps ∼36% -60%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (31 – 50.5, n=8)

41.4 fps ∼100% +34%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU

33.8 (12min) fps ∼82% +9%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
31 fps ∼75%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (6.1 – 31, n=7, last 2 years)

13 fps ∼31% -58%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU

145 (127.5min) fps ∼100% +27%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (78.8 – 154, n=24)

121.7 fps ∼84% +6%

Schenker Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

117 (101.4min) fps ∼81% +2%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

114.4 (100.9min) fps ∼79%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU

113 (99.7min) fps ∼78% -1%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

67.8 (58.8min) fps ∼47% -41%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

65.3 (58.2min) fps ∼45% -43%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (7.9 – 117, n=93, last 2 years)

52.7 fps ∼36% -54%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU

134.4 (116.2min) fps ∼100% +23%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (73.7 – 145, n=24)

114.9 fps ∼85% +5%

Schenker Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

113 (95.5min) fps ∼84% +4%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

109.1 (95.7min) fps ∼81%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU

107.7 (95.3min) fps ∼80% -1%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

62.7 (53.2min) fps ∼47% -43%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

59.1 (52min) fps ∼44% -46%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (7.2 – 113, n=92, last 2 years)

48 fps ∼36% -56%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
79 fps ∼100%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (52 – 94, n=13)

76.5 fps ∼97% -3%

Schenker Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
64 fps ∼81% -19%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
64 fps ∼81% -19%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
30 fps ∼38% -62%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
28 fps ∼35% -65%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (10 – 79, n=41, last 2 years)

26 fps ∼33% -67%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
75 fps ∼100%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (49 – 89, n=13)

71.3 fps ∼95% -5%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
61 fps ∼81% -19%

Schenker Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
59 fps ∼79% -21%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
28 fps ∼37% -63%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
26 fps ∼35% -65%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (9 – 75, n=33, last 2 years)

25 fps ∼33% -67%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

120.8 (90min, 73P1) fps ∼100%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU

106.1 (90min, 70P1) fps ∼88% -12%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (68 – 131, n=11)

104.8 fps ∼87% -13%

Schenker Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

97.1 (63min, 56P1) fps ∼80% -20%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (24.4 – 120.8, n=14, last 2 years)

48.2 fps ∼40% -60%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

40.9 (35min, 32P1) fps ∼34% -66%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

39.5 (28min, 30P1) fps ∼33% -67%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

59.2 (51min, 48P1) fps ∼100%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (44.4 – 69, n=11)

54 fps ∼91% -9%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU

52.7 (44min, 43P1) fps ∼89% -11%

Schenker Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

46.8 (38min, 37P1) fps ∼79% -21%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

29.9 (22min, 23P1) fps ∼51% -49%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

27.8 (18min, 19P1) fps ∼47% -53%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (5.37 – 59.2, n=13, last 2 years)

25.4 fps ∼43% -57%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (37.4 – 106, n=21)

52.5 fps ∼100% +5%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
50.1 fps ∼95%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
47.4 fps ∼90% -5%

Schenker Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
40.8 fps ∼78% -19%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
26.7 fps ∼51% -47%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
25.1 fps ∼48% -50%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (5.24 – 50.1, n=64, last 2 years)

16.2 fps ∼31% -68%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (51.5 – 106, n=21)

71.5 fps ∼100% +1%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
71 fps ∼99%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
66.1 fps ∼92% -7%

Schenker Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
58.3 fps ∼82% -18%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
26.7 fps ∼37% -62%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
25.1 fps ∼35% -65%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (7.88 – 71, n=73, last 2 years)

21.6 fps ∼30% -70%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (79.2 – 117.3, n=21)

103.1 fps ∼100% +2%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

100.8 (65.8min, 74.7P1) fps ∼98%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU

94.7 (65.8min, 72.2P1) fps ∼92% -6%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU

93.7 (67.2min, 71.4P1) fps ∼91% -7%

Schenker Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

89.4 (64.6min, 67.3P1) fps ∼87% -11%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

36.3 (13.3min, 20.1P1) fps ∼35% -64%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

35.3 (12.9min, 18.8P1) fps ∼34% -65%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (13.3 – 100.8, n=57, last 2 years)

32 fps ∼31% -68%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (68 – 101.3, n=22)

89.6 fps ∼100% +4%

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

86 (52.1min, 63.8P1) fps ∼96%

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU

82.4 (29.6min, 63.4P1) fps ∼92% -4%

Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU

80.7 (50.2min, 62.2P1) fps ∼90% -6%

Schenker Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

76.7 (54min, 57.9P1) fps ∼86% -11%

Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

29.2 (7.8min, 10.5P1) fps ∼33% -66%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

28.6 (9min, 10.9P1) fps ∼32% -67%

Average of class Subnotebook
  (15.7 – 86, n=50, last 2 years)

27.6 fps ∼31% -68%

051015202530354045Tooltip

The gaming performance remains consistent under continuous stress, as our Witcher 3 loop shows. However, testing whether the quieter power profiles can provide enough gaming performance may be worthwhile depending on the game. In battery mode, the gaming performance is significantly reduced and the details have to be reduced drastically for games to remain playable.

Compared to the previous model, nothing has changed in terms of the cooling solution. The Vision 14 still uses two fans and two heatpipes. Although some of the results have slightly shifted, they essentially match those of the older model. Our results from various scenarios are listed in the following table. We did not notice any electronic noise.

Profile
Cinebench R23 Multi
Witcher 3 Ultra
Stress test

Quiet 20 dB
26 dB(A)
32.5 dB(A)
32.5 dB(A)

Quiet 30 dB
26 dB(A)
40 dB(A)
40 dB(A)

Quiet 40 dB
27.8 dB(A)
45.8 dB(A)
45.8 dB(A)

Performance Balanced
29.2 dB(A)
45.8 dB(A)
45.8 dB(A)

Performance Enthusiast
46 dB(A)
48.2dB(A)
48.8 dB(A)

Performance Overboost
48.2 dB(A)
51.1 dB(A)
51.1 dB(A)

Noise Level

Idle

24.4 / 24.4 / 27.8 dB(A)

Load

43.3 / 48.8 dB(A)
 

 30 dB
silent

40 dB(A)
audible

50 dB(A)
loud

 
min: , med: , max:    Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24.4 dB(A)

dB(A)
0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.132.931.634.831.930.834.72533.631.430.833.631.731.6333130.426.330.826.626.72627.1403028.727.528.830.729.330.65027.526.929.327.927.226.6286325.123.925.424.724.223.724.3802526.634.121.221.121.422.61003027.222.12119.219.921.812524.623.923.72122.119.823.216026.128.622.721.521.519.424.120028.930.524.820.220.418.820.925025.725.226.319.118.316.919.931528.327.826.219.117.417.118.540031.831.128.717.315.21417.150034.633.629.916.914.612.91663034.634.129.117.415.414.216.880033.633.728.816.314.812.715.9100036.235.632.616.614.611.216.6125037.537.731.416.113.611.316.316003836.232.61613.211.215.7200037.937.533.716.613.911.216.2250039.538.433.815.813.11115315038.137.832.81412.411.313.84000393932.614.512.711.613.7500036.23629.213.712.511.913.1630035.134.328.213.61312.212.8800032.630.724.913.713.112.212.81000028.526.720.314.413.412.5131250026.224.919.614.314.312.112.71600021.119.816.114.214.311.612.3SPL48.848.243.327.82624.427.4N6.46.24.310.80.60.9median 33.6median 33.6median 28.7median 16.3median 14.3median 12.2median 16Delta4.24.24.32.51.92.72.5hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSchenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BWHuawei MateBook X Pro 2022
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TBLenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLRDell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013NAsus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZApple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Schenker Vision 14
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BWoff / environment *24.4

23.5

4%

24.1

1%

23.2

5%

25.4

-4%

24.8

-2%

24.3

-0%

Idle Minimum *24.4

23.5

4%

24.1

1%

23.2

5%

25.4

-4%

24.8

-2%

24.3

-0%

Idle Average *24.4

23.5

4%

24.1

1%

23.2

5%

25.4

-4%

24.8

-2%

24.3

-0%

Idle Maximum *27.8

25.9

7%

30

-8%

23.2

17%

30.9

-11%

24.8

11%

25.9

7%

Load Average *43.3

33.8

22%

39.4

9%

47.5

-10%

56

-29%

27.8

36%

43.3

-0%

Witcher 3 ultra *48.2

35.4

27%

39.4

18%

51.7

-7%

27.8

42%

44.6

7%

Load Maximum *48.8

40.6

17%

39.4

19%

51.7

-6%

56

-15%

49.5

-1%

49.5

-1%

* … smaller is better

There are also striking similarities to the predecessor when it comes to the surface temperatures. During idle and when performing undemanding tasks, the temperatures remain low, whereas the center area above the keyboard and the bottom center area can reach close to a very hot 50 °C (122 °F) and above 50 °C, respectively. We advise against using the laptop on your lap in these scenarios. With only up to 45 °C (113 °F) under load, the iGPU version remains significantly cooler.

During our stress test, the graphics card stays at 35 watts consistently, while the processor initially consumes around 31 watts before stabilizing at 25 watts after a few minutes. The full performance is still available directly after the stress test.

CPU/GPU readings stress test

 47.2 °C
117 F48.4 °C
119 F46.4 °C
116 F  44.8 °C
113 F47.3 °C
117 F39.4 °C
103 F  26.2 °C
79 F26.2 °C
79 F26.6 °C
80 F 

Maximum: 48.4 °C=119 F
Average: 39.2 °C=103 F

49.2 °C
121 F57.1 °C
135 F52.4 °C
126 F42.1 °C
108 F45.5 °C
114 F42.1 °C
108 F28.8 °C
84 F30.5 °C
87 F30.7 °C
87 F

Maximum: 57.1 °C=135 F
Average: 42 °C=108 F Power Supply (max.)  48.9 °C=120 F | Room Temperature 20.8 °C=69 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.4 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 57.1 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 39.5 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.5 °C / 83.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-0.2 °C / -0.4 F).

Due to the large battery, two new speaker modules had to be used. There is no perceivable difference, however, and the audio quality remains one of the weaknesses of the Vision 14. The speakers sound very thin and cannot compete with those of other multimedia laptops.

dB(A)
0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.831.92531.633.7312627.54029.325.55026.627.96323.726.88021.426.510019.93212519.835.616019.440.720018.845.425016.948.331517.1544001461.150012.969.963014.271.980012.771.3100011.270.4125011.369.5160011.269.1200011.272.225001171315011.374.2400011.669500011.964.2630012.263.3800012.261.21000012.5611250012.156.51600011.648.2SPL24.481.9N0.650.6median 12.2median 63.3Delta2.710.430.235.431.734.925.834.932.236.927.535.924.544.323.154.723.365.121.966.320.164.521.566.818.869.817.671.914.972.613.770.91473.611.273.711.171.610.772.312.272.411.273.511.674.511.775.7127312.273.812.469.712.568.212.667.112.563.911.968.524.884.90.668.3median 12.5median 71.62.33hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSchenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 TiApple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro EntryFrequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 – 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass – on average 20.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 – 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids – on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 – 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs – only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 – 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 – 315 Hz
(+) | good bass – only 4.3% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 – 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids – only 1.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 – 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs – only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 – 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 17%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Although the energy consumption has been improved slightly compared to the older model, the Vision 14’s consumption of more than 11 watts still does not make it a very efficient device, which is a consequence of the 3K panel. We measured a maximum consumption of 110 watts (which drops and stabilizes at ~93 watts after a few minutes). Since the battery capacity did not change during the test, the included 90-watt AC adapter appears to come with some hidden reserves. Charging and powering the device with a USB-C charger (minimum 65-watt) is generally possible, 90-watt models will then likely be unable to reach the full performance potential of the Vision 14 or be forced to resort to accessing the battery under full load.

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2880×1800, 14.00Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022
i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB, IPS, 3120×2080, 14.20Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 3840×2400, 14.00Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N, IPS, 2240×1400, 14.00Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ, OLED, 2880×1800, 14.00Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 8-Core, M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0512, Mini-LED, 3024×1964, 14.20Schenker Vision 14
i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2880×1800, 14.00Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
 Average of class Subnotebook
 Idle Minimum *7.5

6.5

13%

7.1

5%

6.3

16%

6.6

12%

2.9

61%

6.7

11%

8.45 ?(2.6 – 23, n=22)

-13%

4.61 ?(1.67 – 11.8, n=99, last 2 years)

39%

Idle Average *10.4

13.7

-32%

10

4%

10.3

1%

9.6

8%

11.6

-12%

12.6

-21%

12.5 ?(6.5 – 25, n=22)

-20%

7.9 ?(4.6 – 17.4, n=99, last 2 years)

24%

Idle Maximum *11.4

14.4

-26%

10.8

5%

20

-75%

7.3

36%

11.9

-4%

15.4

-35%

17.3 ?(7.9 – 30, n=22)

-52%

9.71 ?(5.1 – 22.4, n=99, last 2 years)

15%

Load Average *83.3

64.6

22%

64

23%

106.2

-27%

73

12%

49.5

41%

85.7

-3%

92 ?(65.8 – 129, n=22)

-10%

41.6 ?(8.3 – 85.7, n=100, last 2 years)

50%

Witcher 3 ultra *92.7

57.2

38%

47.7

49%

96.1

-4%

74.4

20%

58.2

37%

83

10%

Load Maximum *110.3

90.9

18%

97

12%

136.5

-24%

119

-8%

68.5

38%

110.9

-1%

140.3 ?(97.3 – 195, n=22)

-27%

60.1 ?(19.6 – 110.9, n=99, last 2 years)

46%

* … smaller is better

0102030405060708090100110Tooltip; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø92.7 (89.5-95.7)

; 1280×720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø105.4 (97-110.4)

0102030405060708090100Tooltip; Prime95 V28,10 Stress (external Monitor): Ø78.5 (70.7-87.8)

; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø93.6 (84.2-97.4)

; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø46.6 (44.6-51.7)

; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø97 (70.2-103.8)

; 1280×720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø73.9 (70.3-77.6)

; 1920×1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø89.6 (86.5-92)

; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø9.56 (8.17-12)

Charging while the laptop is runningWith 99 Wh, the new battery offers almost twice the capacity, unsurprisingly resulting in a significantly improved battery life. While the predecessor was only able to last between 4.5-5.5 hours in our Wi-Fi test depending on the brightness setting, the new model reaches 8-10 hours and 11 hours of video playback at a brightness of 150 nits (about 36 % maximum brightness in the case of our test device). While these results are good, they also show that the 3K panel simply is not very efficient. A device with this much battery capacity could have otherwise reached even better runtimes.

When the device is switched on, the charging process takes 105 minutes; 50 % battery is already available after 36 minutes. The iGPU model of the Vision 14 reaches essentially the same results with a deviation of within a few minutes.

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing (Edge 106)
10h 07min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 106)
7h 59min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 06min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 04min

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.8 WhHuawei MateBook X Pro 2022
i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 WhLenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 75 WhDell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, 64 WhAsus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T
R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, 63 WhApple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 8-Core, M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, 69.9 WhSchenker Vision 14
i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 53 WhAverage of class Subnotebook
 H.264666

455

-32%

758

14%

900

35%

405

-39%

714 ?(263 – 1153, n=46, last 2 years)

7%

WiFi v1.3607

451

-26%

517

-15%

432

-29%

569

-6%

816

34%

327

-46%

575 ?(258 – 1223, n=103, last 2 years)

-5%

Load124

100

-19%

98

-21%

54

-56%

112

-10%

69

-44%

86

-31%

114.6 ?(58 – 255, n=63, last 2 years)

-8%

Reader / Idle712

687

1310 ?(649 – 2925, n=30, last 2 years)

Pros+ robust, lightweight magnesium chassis

+ significantly improved CPU performance

+ longer battery life thanks to 99-Wh battery

+ generous port selection including TB4

+ excellent 3K panel with no PWM

+ 2x RAM slots

+ fantastic system performance

+ fullsize SD card reader

Cons- hinge does not reliably prevent teetering

– models with 99-Wh battery are thicker and heavier, only 1x M.2 SSD

– significant GPU throttling in battery mode

– Wi-Fi 6E is not supported

In review: Schenker Vision 14 Alder Lake-H45. Test device courtesy of Schenker Technologies.With the latest version of the Vision 14, Schenker addresses both of our main criticisms of the predecessor. The new Alder Lake-H45 processor offers a lot more performance than the older Tiger Lake chip, making the Vision 14 one of the fastest models in its device class. Similarly, the RTX 3050 Ti performs decently well, although the developments in this area have been few and far between for a while, which makes us even more excited for the upcoming RTX 4000 GPUs.

Thanks to the new 99-Wh battery, the battery runtimes increase dramatically as well, although this comes at the cost of an around 0.44 lbs greater weight, a thickness increased by 1 mm (~0.04 in), and the secondary M.2-2280 SSD slot. While the lighter version with the smaller 53-Wh battery is still available, it must be configured with the dedicated GeForce GPU. For users with no need for long runtimes, the more lightweight model is still an easy recommendation.

Thanks to the Core i7-12700H and the 99-Wh battery, the new Vision 14 ist no longer as limited in terms of the CPU performance or battery life. While the 14-inch chassis is slightly heavier and marginally thicker, the combination of good performance, a wide variety of ports, good maintenance options, and a beautiful 3K display with 90 Hz make the Vision 14 an extremely exciting and excellent 14-inch laptop.

The Vision 14 retains its very small footprint, sufficient port options, RAM slots, and removable Wi-Fi module despite its slightly thicker and heavier chassis. Although the incompatibility with modern 6-GHz networks (Wi-Fi 6E) is a drawback, users likely will not be limited by this for a while. Furthermore, the lid hinges are not as tight compared to competitors, resulting in fairly significant teetering. Although the 90-watt AC adapter is too weak nominally, it appears to be sufficient for the 110-W peak consumption. Moreover, users will still have to contend with high surface temperatures and loud fans under high loads or while gaming. This is simply a result of very high-performance components in a compact chassis.

Competitors with similar performance characteristics and dedicated GPUs are significantly heavier than the Vision 14 and this is essentially the maximum performance currently available in this small of a form factor. However, the Vision 14 with the RTX 3050 Ti is not exactly a bargain, being priced similarly as the current MacBook Pro 14 (albeit with less RAM and storage). The latter is likely a better choice for users who are not reliant on Windows due to the mini LED panel, the efficient M1 Pro chip, and the excellent speaker setup. Meanwhile, the Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 – while being noticeably heavier and thicker – is a much cheaper alternative.

Schenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti

10/25/2022 v7

Andreas Osthoff

Connectivity

67 / 75 → 90%

Games Performance

91 / 78 → 100%

Application Performance

95 / 85 → 100%

Subnotebook – Weighted Average

Linked ArticlesSchenker Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti (Vision 14 Series)

Related Articles

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff – Managing Editor Business Laptops – 1437 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

I grew up with modern consumer electronics and my first computer was a Commodore C64, which encouraged my interest in building my own systems. I started working as a review editor for Notebookcheck during my dual studies at Siemens. Currently, I am mainly responsible for dealing with business laptops and mobile workstations. It’s a great experience to be able to review the latest devices and technologies and then compare them with each other.

Translator: Marius Schell – Tech Writer – 370 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

Even in my youth I was already very enthusiastic about technology, and as a result I started building PCs, optimizing them, and writing programs while I was still in school. When dealing with the inevitable hardware and software problems associated with computers, I was always relentless in my search for the necessary solutions. The compact forms of laptops and smartphones introduced further challenges in this regard. In my reviews for Notebookcheck I try to communicate as objectively as possible how well a device copes with these hurdles.

Andreas Osthoff, 2022-10-28 (Update: 2022-10-28)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *